Earle Mack vs. Joe Ranson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Earle Mack posted the stronger offensive profile against Joe Ranson. Earle Mack posted stronger numbers in OPS (.375 vs .333) and on-base percentage (.125 vs .111). By the career numbers, Earle Mack had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Earle Mack and Joe Ranson
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.368
0.368
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.106
0.106
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
13.84
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
2.91
Fielding Stats for Earle Mack and Joe Ranson
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
1.8
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.6
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
5
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.59
92.59
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.778
2.778
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
20
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.89
88.89
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Joe Ranson
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
3.8