Earle Mack vs. Jim Olander — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Earle Mack posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Olander. Earle Mack posted stronger numbers in OPS (.375 vs .182) and slugging (.250 vs .000). Jim Olander had the advantage in on-base percentage (.182 vs .125). By the career numbers, Earle Mack had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Earle Mack and Jim Olander
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0.082
0.082
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5.33
5.33
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
2.2
2.2
Fielding Stats for Earle Mack and Jim Olander
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Jim Olander
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
2.89
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jim Olander
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.64
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Jim Olander
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
2.89
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Jim Olander
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
2.89
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Olander
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
20
Jim Olander
Career
Per 9 Innings
22.22
22.22