Earle Mack vs. Jim Oglesby — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Oglesby posted the stronger offensive profile against Earle Mack. Jim Oglesby posted stronger numbers in OPS (.490 vs .375) and on-base percentage (.308 vs .125). Earle Mack had the advantage in slugging (.250 vs .182). By the career numbers, Jim Oglesby had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Earle Mack and Jim Oglesby
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Oglesby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jim Oglesby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.539
0.539
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Oglesby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Oglesby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Jim Oglesby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.184
0.184
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Jim Oglesby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
13.84
Jim Oglesby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.96
44.31
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5.33
5.33
Jim Oglesby
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Earle Mack and Jim Oglesby
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Jim Oglesby
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Oglesby
Career
Per 9 Innings
100