Joe Lutz vs. Ed McKenna — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Joe Lutz posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McKenna. Joe Lutz posted stronger numbers in OPS (.508 vs .411) and on-base percentage (.286 vs .215). Ed McKenna had the advantage in batting average (.188 vs .167). By the career numbers, Joe Lutz had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Joe Lutz and Ed McKenna
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.548
0.548
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.422
0.422
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.046
0.046
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.215
0.215
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.197
0.197
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.009
0.009
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.184
0.184
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.146
0.146
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.467
0.467
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Fielding Stats for Joe Lutz and Ed McKenna
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
40
1.41
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
82.93
82.93