Joe Lutz vs. Connie Mack — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Connie Mack posted the stronger offensive profile against Joe Lutz. Connie Mack posted stronger numbers in OPS (.604 vs .508) and on-base percentage (.305 vs .286). By the career numbers, Connie Mack had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Joe Lutz and Connie Mack
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.548
0.548
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.656
0.656
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
0.17
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
12
171.43
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
893
181.69
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.305
0.305
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.184
0.184
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.467
0.467
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.574
0.574
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
2.98
42.54
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
319.33
64.97
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
4.67
4.67
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
23.22
23.22
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.67
0.67
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
1.34
1.34
Fielding Stats for Joe Lutz and Connie Mack
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
729
1.06
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
80
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
4238
6.18
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.02
93.02
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
7.273
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.813
5.813