Joe Lutz vs. Ed MacGamwell — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed MacGamwell posted the stronger offensive profile against Joe Lutz. Ed MacGamwell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.544 vs .508) and on-base percentage (.294 vs .286). By the career numbers, Ed MacGamwell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Joe Lutz and Ed MacGamwell
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.548
0.548
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.559
0.559
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
12
171.43
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 600 PA
5
176.47
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.294
0.294
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.184
0.184
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.195
0.195
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.467
0.467
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.417
0.417
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
2.98
42.54
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 600 PA
1.51
53.45
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
4.67
4.67
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 600 PA
5.67
5.67
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.67
0.67
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Fielding Stats for Joe Lutz and Ed MacGamwell
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
0.97
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
80
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 9 Innings
39
9.49
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.12
95.12
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
7.273
Ed MacGamwell
Career
Per 9 Innings
9.75
9.75