Tom Long vs. Ed Wolfe — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Tom Long and Ed Wolfe are fairly close on the surface numbers. Tom Long posted stronger numbers in WHIP (2.000 vs 3.273) and home runs allowed (0 per nine innings vs 2.45). Ed Wolfe had the advantage in ERA (7.36 vs 9). By the career numbers, Tom Long had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.
Pitching Stats for Tom Long and Ed Wolfe
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.15
6.15
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
20.14
20.14
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
6
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.91
10.91
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.286
0.286
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.467
0.467
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
17.18
17.18
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.45
2.45
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.33
0.33
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
12.27
12.27
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.636
1.636
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
7.36
7.36
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
31.5
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
36.82
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.286
0.286
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.462
0.462
Tom Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
40.5
40.5
Ed Wolfe
Career
Per 9 Innings
51.55
51.55