Dan Long vs. Mike Rose — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Mike Rose posted the stronger offensive profile against Dan Long. Mike Rose posted stronger numbers in OPS (.542 vs .457) and slugging (.296 vs .156). Dan Long had the advantage in on-base percentage (.301 vs .246). By the career numbers, Mike Rose had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dan Long and Mike Rose
Dan Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.156
0.156
Mike Rose
Career
Per 600 PA
0.204
0.204
Dan Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.651
0.651
Mike Rose
Career
Per 600 PA
0.553
0.553
Dan Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.301
0.301
Mike Rose
Career
Per 600 PA
0.246
0.246
Dan Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.156
0.156
Mike Rose
Career
Per 600 PA
0.296
0.296
Dan Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Mike Rose
Career
Per 600 PA
0.185
0.185
Dan Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.677
0.677
Mike Rose
Career
Per 600 PA
0.413
0.413
Fielding Stats for Dan Long and Mike Rose
Dan Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
1.19
Mike Rose
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
1.42
Dan Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
33
1.87
Mike Rose
Career
Per 9 Innings
101
7.53
Dan Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
31
1.75
Mike Rose
Career
Per 9 Innings
99
7.38
Dan Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.94
93.94
Mike Rose
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.02
98.02
Dan Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.476
1.476
Mike Rose
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.211
5.211