Thomas Long vs. Chris McFarland — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Chris McFarland posted the stronger offensive profile against Thomas Long. Chris McFarland posted stronger numbers in OPS (.500 vs .333) and slugging (.286 vs .000). Thomas Long had the advantage in on-base percentage (.333 vs .214). By the career numbers, Chris McFarland had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Thomas Long and Chris McFarland
Thomas Long
Career
Per 600 PA
1
200
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
3
128.57
Thomas Long
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
Thomas Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Thomas Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.05
10.43
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.83
35.4
Thomas Long
Career
Per 600 PA
1
200
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
3
128.57
Thomas Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Thomas Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
0.15
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.168
0.168
Thomas Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.364
0.364
Thomas Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.11
21.85
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.82
35.02
Thomas Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Thomas Long and Chris McFarland
Thomas Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.09
Thomas Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
27
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
99
27
Thomas Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
33
9
Thomas Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
57.14
57.14
Thomas Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0