James Lockman vs. Earle Mack — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Earle Mack posted the stronger offensive profile against James Lockman. Earle Mack posted stronger numbers in OPS (.375 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.125 vs .000). By the career numbers, Earle Mack had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for James Lockman and Earle Mack
James Lockman
Career
Per 600 PA
2
171.43
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5
187.5
James Lockman
Career
Per 600 PA
7
600
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
16
600
James Lockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.136
0.136
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
James Lockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
James Lockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
James Lockman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
James Lockman
Career
Per 600 PA
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5.33
5.33
James Lockman
Career
Per 600 PA
1
85.71
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
1
37.5
James Lockman
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for James Lockman and Earle Mack
James Lockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.06
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
James Lockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.06
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
James Lockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
4.24
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
James Lockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
3.71
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
James Lockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.5
87.5
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
James Lockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.5
3.5
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
James Lockman
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
20