Harry Little vs. Earle Mack — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Harry Little and Earle Mack are closely matched on the surface stats. Harry Little posted stronger numbers in on-base percentage (.235 vs .125) and batting average (.133 vs .125). Earle Mack had the advantage in slugging (.250 vs .133). By the career numbers, Harry Little had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Harry Little and Earle Mack
Harry Little
Career
Per 600 PA
17
600
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
16
600
Harry Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.133
0.133
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Harry Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.412
0.412
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Harry Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.53
18.66
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.59
22.05
Harry Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Harry Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.133
0.133
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Harry Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.139
0.139
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Harry Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Harry Little
Career
Per 600 PA
0.45
16
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
13.84
Harry Little
Career
Per 600 PA
2.43
2.43
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5.33
5.33
Fielding Stats for Harry Little and Earle Mack
Harry Little
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Harry Little
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
3.25
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Harry Little
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
3
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Harry Little
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.31
92.31
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100