Chris Latham vs. Ed McLane — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Chris Latham posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McLane. Chris Latham posted stronger numbers in OPS (.560 vs .333) and slugging (.277 vs .000). Ed McLane had the advantage in on-base percentage (.333 vs .283). By the career numbers, Chris Latham had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Chris Latham and Ed McLane
Chris Latham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.61
0.61
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Chris Latham
Career
Per 600 PA
19.55
48.88
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.05
10.43
Chris Latham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
0.28
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Chris Latham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.195
0.195
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
0.15
Chris Latham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.529
0.529
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Chris Latham
Career
Per 600 PA
18.99
47.48
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.12
24.28
Chris Latham
Career
Per 600 PA
2.82
2.82
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Chris Latham and Ed McLane
Chris Latham
Career
Per 9 Innings
89
1.54
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Chris Latham
Career
Per 9 Innings
49
0.85
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Chris Latham
Career
Per 9 Innings
520.1
9
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
9
Chris Latham
Career
Per 9 Innings
149
2.58
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.7
Chris Latham
Career
Per 9 Innings
146
2.53
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Chris Latham
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.99
97.99
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
33.33
33.33
Chris Latham
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.64
1.64
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Chris Latham
Career
Per 9 Innings
55.06
55.06
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100