Patrick Larkins vs. Earl Pruess — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Earl Pruess had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .284). By the career numbers, Earl Pruess had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Patrick Larkins and Earl Pruess
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 600 PA
17
137.84
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 600 PA
74
600
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.541
0.541
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
1.875
1.875
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 600 PA
21
170.27
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 600 PA
11
89.19
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 600 PA
6.28
50.94
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
0.53
317.25
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Patrick Larkins and Earl Pruess
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 9 Innings
17
1.01
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 9 Innings
62
3.7
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
2.68
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 9 Innings
72.58
72.58
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Patrick Larkins
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.647
2.647
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 9 Innings
2