David Lamb vs. Jim Roxburgh — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, David Lamb and Jim Roxburgh are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim Roxburgh posted stronger numbers in OPS (.607 vs .561) and on-base percentage (.357 vs .273). David Lamb had the advantage in slugging (.288 vs .250). By the career numbers, Jim Roxburgh had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for David Lamb and Jim Roxburgh
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
150
600
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.216
0.216
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.573
0.573
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.643
0.643
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
10.08
40.32
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
1.21
51.67
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.195
0.195
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.223
0.223
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.556
0.556
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
10.21
40.85
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
1.58
67.75
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
7.14
7.14
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
14
14
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
0.52
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Fielding Stats for David Lamb and Jim Roxburgh
David Lamb
Career
Per 9 Innings
64
1.76
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.5
David Lamb
Career
Per 9 Innings
185
5.09
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
8.4
David Lamb
Career
Per 9 Innings
176
4.84
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
6.9
David Lamb
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.14
95.14
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
82.14
82.14
David Lamb
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.75
2.75
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.6
4.6