David Lamb vs. Jim Long — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, David Lamb and Jim Long are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim Long had the edge in on-base percentage (.286 vs .273). By the career numbers, Jim Long had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for David Lamb and Jim Long
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.216
0.216
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.215
0.215
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.573
0.573
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.653
0.653
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.233
0.233
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.204
0.204
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.007
0.007
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.008
0.008
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.033
0.033
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.037
0.037
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.072
0.072
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.064
0.064
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.195
0.195
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.199
0.199
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.604
0.604
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
10.21
40.85
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
27.23
59.2
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
7.14
7.14
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
8.36
8.36
David Lamb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
0.52
Jim Long
Career
Per 600 PA
0.58
0.58
Fielding Stats for David Lamb and Jim Long
David Lamb
Career
Per 9 Innings
64
1.76
Jim Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
61
1.03
David Lamb
Career
Per 9 Innings
185
5.09
Jim Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
145
2.44
David Lamb
Career
Per 9 Innings
176
4.84
Jim Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
129
2.17
David Lamb
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.14
95.14
Jim Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.97
88.97
David Lamb
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.75
2.75
Jim Long
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.115
2.115