Al Lakeman vs. Earle Mack — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Al Lakeman posted the stronger offensive profile against Earle Mack. Al Lakeman posted stronger numbers in OPS (.562 vs .375) and on-base percentage (.248 vs .125). By the career numbers, Al Lakeman had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Al Lakeman and Earle Mack
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.576
0.576
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.282
0.282
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.314
0.314
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
0.19
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.457
0.457
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
48.41
42.16
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
13.84
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
5.03
5.03
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5.33
5.33
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 600 PA
15
13.06
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Al Lakeman and Earle Mack
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
199
99.5
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
826
413
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
810
405
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.06
98.06
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Al Lakeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.01
1.01
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
20