Dave Krynzel vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Dave Krynzel. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .486) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .278). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dave Krynzel and Jim Smith
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.519
0.519
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 600 PA
3.09
34.34
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.208
0.208
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.021
0.021
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.177
0.177
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 600 PA
3.38
37.57
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Dave Krynzel and Jim Smith
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
1.15
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
1.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 9 Innings
33
3.44
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 9 Innings
32
3.34
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.97
96.97
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.909
2.909
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Dave Krynzel
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100