Otto Krueger vs. Jim Riley — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Otto Krueger posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Riley. Otto Krueger posted stronger numbers in OPS (.648 vs .500) and slugging (.322 vs .000). Jim Riley had the advantage in on-base percentage (.500 vs .326). By the career numbers, Otto Krueger had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Otto Krueger and Jim Riley
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 600 PA
1948
600
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.694
0.694
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 600 PA
204.07
62.85
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
29.73
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.326
0.326
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 600 PA
228.99
70.53
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.21
64.17
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 600 PA
13.25
13.25
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 600 PA
1.09
1.09
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Fielding Stats for Otto Krueger and Jim Riley
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 9 Innings
470
1.06
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.8
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
0.23
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.8
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 9 Innings
12018
27
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
27
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 9 Innings
1941
4.36
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
9
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 9 Innings
1737
3.9
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
5.4
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 9 Innings
89.49
89.49
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.696
3.696
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Otto Krueger
Career
Per 9 Innings
21.7
21.7
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100