John Kiley vs. Chet Laabs — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Chet Laabs posted the stronger offensive profile against John Kiley. Chet Laabs posted stronger numbers in OPS (.798 vs .592) and on-base percentage (.346 vs .281). By the career numbers, Chet Laabs had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Kiley and Chet Laabs
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
15
140.63
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
950
161.11
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
64
600
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
3538
600
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.262
0.262
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.609
0.609
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.808
0.808
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.384
0.384
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
51.95
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
491.49
83.35
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
18
168.75
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
1403
237.93
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
18
168.75
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
1212
205.54
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.281
0.281
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.346
0.346
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.31
0.31
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.452
0.452
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.103
0.103
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
0.19
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.204
0.204
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.522
0.522
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.774
0.774
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
5.89
55.24
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
499.24
84.66
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
64
64
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
5.95
5.95
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
0.65
John Kiley
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 600 PA
60
10.18
Fielding Stats for John Kiley and Chet Laabs
John Kiley
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
1.02
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 9 Innings
820
John Kiley
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
1.22
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 9 Innings
1842
John Kiley
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60
Chet Laabs
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.67