Pete Kilduff vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Pete Kilduff. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .702) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .338). Pete Kilduff had the advantage in home run production (4 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Kilduff and Jim Smith
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
1589
600
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.27
0.27
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.733
0.733
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.251
0.251
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
181.65
68.59
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.338
0.338
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.364
0.364
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.094
0.094
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.658
0.658
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
199.66
75.39
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 600 PA
12.04
12.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Pete Kilduff and Jim Smith
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 9 Innings
414
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 9 Innings
2053
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Pete Kilduff
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.18
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100