Walter Keating vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Walter Keating. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .352) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .196). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Walter Keating and Jim Smith
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
51
600
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
0.089
0.089
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
1.93
22.68
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
0.196
0.196
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
0.156
0.156
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
0.067
0.067
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
0.127
0.127
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
0.342
0.342
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
0.81
9.49
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Walter Keating
Career
Per 600 PA
3.92
3.92
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Walter Keating and Jim Smith
Walter Keating
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Walter Keating
Career
Per 9 Innings
58
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Walter Keating
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.63
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100