W. L. Keane vs. Ed Young — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Young posted the stronger offensive profile against W. L. Keane. Ed Young posted stronger numbers in OPS (.748 vs .333) and on-base percentage (.338 vs .333). By the career numbers, Ed Young had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for W. L. Keane and Ed Young
W. L. Keane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.774
0.774
W. L. Keane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.338
0.338
W. L. Keane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
0.15
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
W. L. Keane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.12
24.28
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
104.56
86.18
Fielding Stats for W. L. Keane and Ed Young
W. L. Keane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
186
1.12
W. L. Keane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
173
1.04
W. L. Keane
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.38
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
1677
10.13
W. L. Keane
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.38
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
1620
9.78
W. L. Keane
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.6
96.6
W. L. Keane
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.01
93.01