Jim Kane vs. Ed Young — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Young posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Kane. Ed Young posted stronger numbers in OPS (.748 vs .603) and on-base percentage (.338 vs .299). By the career numbers, Ed Young had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Kane and Ed Young
Jim Kane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
0.28
Jim Kane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.662
0.662
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.774
0.774
Jim Kane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.301
0.301
Jim Kane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.299
0.299
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.338
0.338
Jim Kane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Jim Kane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.726
0.726
Jim Kane
Career
Per 600 PA
10.38
10.38
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
182
182
Jim Kane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
12.75
12.75
Jim Kane
Career
Per 600 PA
5
18.07
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
20
16.48
Fielding Stats for Jim Kane and Ed Young
Jim Kane
Career
Per 9 Innings
40
1.11
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
186
1.12
Jim Kane
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
1
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
173
1.04
Jim Kane
Career
Per 9 Innings
416
11.52
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
1677
10.13
Jim Kane
Career
Per 9 Innings
402
11.13
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
1620
9.78
Jim Kane
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.63
96.63
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.6
96.6
Jim Kane
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.05
10.05
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.71
8.71
Jim Kane
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.01
93.01