Ed Jurak vs. Jim Small — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Jurak posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Small. Ed Jurak posted stronger numbers in OPS (.692 vs .658) and on-base percentage (.348 vs .318). By the career numbers, Ed Jurak had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Jurak and Jim Small
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.27
0.27
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.712
0.712
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.665
0.665
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.213
0.213
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.346
0.346
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.08
0.08
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.071
0.071
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.618
0.618
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.542
0.542
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
7.12
7.12
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
6.95
6.95
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.78
0.78
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.45
0.45
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
7
12.03
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
2
7.84
Fielding Stats for Ed Jurak and Jim Small
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
157
1.8
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
1.54
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
69
0.79
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
0.92
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
522
6
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
67
2.29
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.78
95.78
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.71
95.71
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.325
3.325
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.489
1.489
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
43.95
43.95
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60