Ed Jurak vs. Albert McNeal — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Jurak posted the stronger offensive profile against Albert McNeal. Ed Jurak posted stronger numbers in OPS (.692 vs .375) and slugging (.344 vs .000). Albert McNeal had the advantage in on-base percentage (.375 vs .348). By the career numbers, Ed Jurak had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Jurak and Albert McNeal
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.712
0.712
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.563
0.563
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
36.17
62.18
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
13.93
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.346
0.346
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.169
0.169
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.618
0.618
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
40.13
69
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
35.12
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
7.12
7.12
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
7
12.03
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Ed Jurak and Albert McNeal
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
157
1.8
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
3.21
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
69
0.79
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.29
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
545
6.26
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
5.79
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
522
6
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
5.79
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.78
95.78
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.325
3.325
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.8
1.8
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
43.95
43.95
Albert McNeal
Career
Per 9 Innings
40
40