Ed Jurak vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Jurak posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Ed Jurak posted stronger numbers in OPS (.692 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.348 vs .248). By the career numbers, Ed Jurak had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Jurak and Jim McLeod
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.712
0.712
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.213
0.213
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.346
0.346
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.344
0.344
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.08
0.08
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.618
0.618
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
7.12
7.12
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.78
0.78
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
7
12.03
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
20
20
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Fielding Stats for Ed Jurak and Jim McLeod
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
157
1.8
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.78
95.78
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.325
3.325
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442