Damon Jones vs. Ted Shaw — Career Comparison
Ted Shaw built a career as a starting pitcher and Damon Jones as a reliever — different jobs with different demands — but on the metrics that apply to both, a comparison is still worth making. Ted Shaw posted stronger surface numbers — ERA 4.77 and WHIP 1.427 compared to 9 and 2.400 for Damon Jones. By the career numbers, Ted Shaw had the better of this cross-role comparison — though era context would sharpen the verdict.
Pitching Stats for Damon Jones and Ted Shaw
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
9.51
9.51
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.06
4.06
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
7
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.92
3.92
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.25
0.25
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.276
0.276
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
9.43
9.43
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.41
0.41
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.3
0.3
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
12.6
12.6
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.42
3.42
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.38
4.38
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.13
3.13
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.4
2.4
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.867
0.867
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
54
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
1721
39.48
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
5.4
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
0.23
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.78
5.78
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
29
0.67
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
36
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
1492
34.23
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.13
4.13
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.333
0.333
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.306
0.306
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
54
54
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
39.48
39.48
Fielding Stats for Damon Jones and Ted Shaw
Damon Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
9
Ted Shaw
Career
Per 9 Innings
61
1.4