W. Johnson vs. Earle Mack — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, W. Johnson posted the stronger offensive profile against Earle Mack. W. Johnson posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.250 vs .375) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .125). By the career numbers, W. Johnson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for W. Johnson and Earle Mack
W. Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
W. Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.2
1.2
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
W. Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
W. Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
W. Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
W. Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.413
0.413
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
W. Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
W. Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.23
148.13
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
13.84
Fielding Stats for W. Johnson and Earle Mack
W. Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
W. Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
50
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100