Upton Johnson vs. Pete McClanahan — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete McClanahan posted the stronger offensive profile against Upton Johnson. Pete McClanahan posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .387) and on-base percentage (.667 vs .225). By the career numbers, Pete McClanahan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Upton Johnson and Pete McClanahan
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
23
164.29
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
7
700
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
84
600
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.162
0.162
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.51
0.51
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
4.08
29.12
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.99
199
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
85.71
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
18
128.57
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
4
400
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.162
0.162
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.387
0.387
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.142
0.142
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.403
0.403
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.162
0.162
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
15
107.14
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
4.03
28.82
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.78
178.28
Upton Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0