Eddie Johnson vs. Jim Small — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Eddie Johnson posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Small. Eddie Johnson posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.333 vs .658) and on-base percentage (.667 vs .318). By the career numbers, Eddie Johnson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Eddie Johnson and Jim Small
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
153
600
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.27
0.27
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.333
1.333
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.665
0.665
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.28
255.07
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
14.43
56.58
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
0.34
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.467
0.467
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.22
243.7
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
16.29
63.9
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
6.95
6.95
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
2
7.84
Fielding Stats for Eddie Johnson and Jim Small
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.8
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
1.54
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.8
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
70
2.4
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.8
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
67
2.29
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.71
95.71
Eddie Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.489
1.489