Ed Johnson vs. Bruce Kimm — Career Comparison

Lost GenerationKentuckyThrows RightBats LeftNorth AmericaWashington SenatorsAmerican LeagueRight Fielder
Baby BoomersIowaThrows RightBats RightNorth AmericaChicago White SoxAmerican LeagueCatcher

Looking at the career totals, Ed Johnson and Bruce Kimm are closely matched on the surface stats. Bruce Kimm posted stronger numbers in slugging (.292 vs .231) and batting average (.237 vs .231). Ed Johnson had the advantage in OPS (.606 vs .581). By the career numbers, Bruce Kimm had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.

Hitting Stats for Ed Johnson and Bruce Kimm

Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
4
4
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
4
141.18
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
186
230.58
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
17
600
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
484
600
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
13
458.82
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
439
544.21
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.237
0.237
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.677
0.677
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.605
0.605
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
3
105.88
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
104
128.93
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PAverified
3
105.88
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
83
102.89
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
19
23.55
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1.24
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1.24
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
21
26.03
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.202
0.202
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.002
0.002
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.01
0.01
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1.37
48.49
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
33.76
41.85
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
3
105.88
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
128
158.68
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PAverified
6
211.76
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
137
169.83
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.375
0.375
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.292
0.292
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.606
0.606
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.581
0.581
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.055
0.055
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.227
0.227
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.6
0.6
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.466
0.466
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.273
0.273
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
35.29
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
35
43.39
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PAverified
2
70.59
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
26
32.23
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PAverified
3
105.88
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
60
74.38
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1.84
64.91
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
36.77
45.58
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1.24
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PAverified
3
105.88
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
32
39.67
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
2
70.59
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PAverified
50
61.98
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
8.5
8.5
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
9.68
9.68
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1.5
1.5
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.64
0.64
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
35.29
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
11
13.64
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1.24
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
13
16.12
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
5
6.2
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
8
9.92
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
13
16.12
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
38.46
38.46

Fielding Stats for Ed Johnson and Bruce Kimm

Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
4
4
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
180
1.3
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
140
1.01
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
3746
27
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
1248.2
9
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
704
5.07
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
63
0.45
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
3
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
0.13
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
785
5.66
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
767
5.53
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
62.5
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
97.71
97.71
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.25
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
4.261
4.261
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
77.78
77.78
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
7
0.05
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
0
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
0.05
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Johnson
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
0
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
0.69
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Bruce Kimm
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
58
0.42