Ed Johnson vs. Bruce Kimm — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Ed Johnson and Bruce Kimm are closely matched on the surface stats. Bruce Kimm posted stronger numbers in slugging (.292 vs .231) and batting average (.237 vs .231). Ed Johnson had the advantage in OPS (.606 vs .581). By the career numbers, Bruce Kimm had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Johnson and Bruce Kimm
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
4
141.18
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
186
230.58
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.677
0.677
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.605
0.605
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
6
211.76
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
137
169.83
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.466
0.466
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.84
64.91
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
36.77
45.58
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
8.5
8.5
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
9.68
9.68
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
0.64
0.64
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 600 PA
13
16.12
Fielding Stats for Ed Johnson and Bruce Kimm
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 9 Innings
180
1.3
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 9 Innings
767
5.53
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
62.5
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.71
97.71
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.25
Bruce Kimm
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.261
4.261