Luis Jimenez vs. Ed McFarland — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed McFarland posted the stronger offensive profile against Luis Jimenez. Ed McFarland posted stronger numbers in OPS (.704 vs .170) and on-base percentage (.335 vs .111). By the career numbers, Ed McFarland had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Luis Jimenez and Ed McFarland
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
7
233.33
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
894
159.45
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
18
600
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
3364
600
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
17
566.67
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
3007
536.33
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
0.059
0.059
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.275
0.275
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
0.194
0.194
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.736
0.736
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
0.12
3.88
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
400.99
71.52
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
1
33.33
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
1109
197.8
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
2
66.67
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
1098
195.84
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.335
0.335
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
0.059
0.059
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.369
0.369
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
0.065
0.065
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.663
0.663
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
0.077
0.077
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.75
-24.94
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
442.02
78.84
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
4
133.33
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
174
31.03
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
4.5
4.5
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
19.33
19.33
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
1.46
1.46
Luis Jimenez
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0