Tice James vs. Ed Jurak — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Jurak posted the stronger offensive profile against Tice James. Ed Jurak posted stronger numbers in OPS (.692 vs .533) and on-base percentage (.348 vs .251). By the career numbers, Ed Jurak had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tice James and Ed Jurak
Tice James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Tice James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.563
0.563
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.712
0.712
Tice James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.268
0.268
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.213
0.213
Tice James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.251
0.251
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.346
0.346
Tice James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.281
0.281
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.344
0.344
Tice James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.075
0.075
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.08
0.08
Tice James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.183
0.183
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Tice James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.449
0.449
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
0.618
0.618
Tice James
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 600 PA
20
20
Fielding Stats for Tice James and Ed Jurak
Tice James
Career
Per 9 Innings
57
1.1
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
157
1.8
Tice James
Career
Per 9 Innings
54
1.04
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
69
0.79
Tice James
Career
Per 9 Innings
262
5.05
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
545
6.26
Tice James
Career
Per 9 Innings
231
4.46
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
522
6
Tice James
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.17
88.17
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.78
95.78
Tice James
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.053
4.053
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.325
3.325
Tice James
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.74
94.74
Ed Jurak
Career
Per 9 Innings
43.95
43.95