Cleo James vs. Hal Quick — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Cleo James posted the stronger offensive profile against Hal Quick. Cleo James posted stronger numbers in OPS (.625 vs .547) and on-base percentage (.308 vs .279). Hal Quick had the advantage in batting average (.244 vs .228). By the career numbers, Cleo James had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Cleo James and Hal Quick
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
208
290.91
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.668
0.668
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.577
0.577
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.253
0.253
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
126
176.22
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.299
0.299
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.268
0.268
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.089
0.089
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.024
0.024
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.579
0.579
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
40.68
56.89
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
3.12
43.54
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
8.25
8.25
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
43
43
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
8
11.19
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
2
27.91
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
18
25.17
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
1
13.95
Cleo James
Career
Per 600 PA
88.89
88.89
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Cleo James and Hal Quick
Cleo James
Career
Per 9 Innings
164
1.54
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Cleo James
Career
Per 9 Innings
241
2.27
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
51
Cleo James
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.77
98.77
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.73