Bert James vs. Jim McDonnell — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Bert James posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McDonnell. Bert James posted stronger numbers in OPS (.686 vs .503) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .272). By the career numbers, Bert James had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Bert James and Jim McDonnell
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
25
600
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
105
600
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.533
0.533
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
3.09
74.18
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
5.1
29.15
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.232
0.232
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.251
0.251
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
0.18
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.733
0.733
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.38
0.38
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
3.64
87.44
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
5.93
33.89
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
8.33
8.33
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
13.13
13.13
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
1.33
1.33
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
22.86
Fielding Stats for Bert James and Jim McDonnell
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.02
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
37
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
1.87
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
150
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
1.7
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
143
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.33
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.667
1.667
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.865