Bert James vs. Tom Marsh — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Bert James and Tom Marsh are closely matched on the surface stats. Bert James posted stronger numbers in OPS (.686 vs .631) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .266). Tom Marsh had the advantage in slugging (.365 vs .286). By the career numbers, Bert James had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Bert James and Tom Marsh
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.246
0.246
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.642
0.642
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.266
0.266
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.365
0.365
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.251
0.251
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
0.733
0.733
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.513
0.513
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
3.64
87.44
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
25.44
57.38
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
8.33
8.33
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
5.43
5.43
Bert James
Career
Per 600 PA
1.33
1.33
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Fielding Stats for Bert James and Tom Marsh
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.02
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
71
1.24
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.02
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
61
1.06
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
1.87
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
126
2.19
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
1.7
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
120
2.09
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.24
95.24
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.667
1.667
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.69
1.69
Bert James
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
85.92
85.92