Art Jacobs vs. Mark Rogers — Career Comparison
Mark Rogers built a career as a starting pitcher and Art Jacobs as a reliever — different jobs with different demands — but on the metrics that apply to both, a comparison is still worth making. Mark Rogers posted stronger surface numbers — ERA 3.49 and WHIP 1.122 compared to 9 and 3.000 for Art Jacobs. By the career numbers, Mark Rogers had the better of this cross-role comparison — though era context would sharpen the verdict.
Pitching Stats for Art Jacobs and Mark Rogers
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
12.01
12.01
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.84
2.84
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
6
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.37
3.37
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.4
0.4
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.214
0.214
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
18
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.98
6.98
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.92
0.92
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.45
0.45
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.12
3.12
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
9.55
9.55
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.408
1.408
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
54
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
201
36.92
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.49
3.49
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
0.55
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
45
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
178
32.69
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.73
1.73
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.4
0.4
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.273
0.273
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
54
54
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
36.92
36.92
Fielding Stats for Art Jacobs and Mark Rogers
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
2.02
Hitting Stats for Art Jacobs and Mark Rogers
Art Jacobs
Career
Per 600 PA
Mark Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206