Chuck Jackson vs. Jim Riley — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Chuck Jackson posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Riley. Chuck Jackson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.618 vs .500) and slugging (.321 vs .000). Jim Riley had the advantage in on-base percentage (.500 vs .297). By the career numbers, Chuck Jackson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Chuck Jackson and Jim Riley
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 600 PA
176
600
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.633
0.633
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 600 PA
14.78
50.39
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
29.73
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.281
0.281
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 600 PA
13.83
47.14
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.21
64.17
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 600 PA
5.03
5.03
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 600 PA
3
10.23
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Chuck Jackson and Jim Riley
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 9 Innings
69
1.63
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.8
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 9 Innings
37
0.87
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.8
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1145
27
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
27
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 9 Innings
381.2
9
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
9
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 9 Innings
123
2.9
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
9
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 9 Innings
114
2.69
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
5.4
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.68
92.68
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.652
1.652
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Chuck Jackson
Career
Per 9 Innings
53.62
53.62
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100