Ken Hunt vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Ken Hunt. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .723) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .307). Ken Hunt had the advantage in home run production (33 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ken Hunt and Jim Smith
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.741
0.741
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.303
0.303
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.417
0.417
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Fielding Stats for Ken Hunt and Jim Smith
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 9 Innings
259
1.27
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 9 Innings
200
0.98
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 9 Innings
463
2.27
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.06
96.06
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ken Hunt
Career
Per 9 Innings
77.22
77.22
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100