Cedric Hunter vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Cedric Hunter. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .355) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .171). Cedric Hunter had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Cedric Hunter and Jim Smith
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.105
0.105
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.369
0.369
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
1.49
21.78
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.184
0.184
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.079
0.079
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.123
0.123
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
6.83
6.83
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 600 PA
1
14.63
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Cedric Hunter and Jim Smith
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
1.48
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
0.95
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
1.91
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
1.91
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.286
1.286
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Cedric Hunter
Career
Per 9 Innings
64.29
64.29
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100