Ed Hug vs. Clarence Mitchell — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Ed Hug had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .400). By the career numbers, Ed Hug had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Hug and Clarence Mitchell
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Clarence Mitchell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Clarence Mitchell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
Clarence Mitchell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
0.18
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Clarence Mitchell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
40.16
Fielding Stats for Ed Hug and Clarence Mitchell
Ed Hug
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Clarence Mitchell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1