Ed Hug vs. Chris McFarland — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Ed Hug had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .214). By the career numbers, Ed Hug had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Hug and Chris McFarland
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.168
0.168
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.82
35.02
Fielding Stats for Ed Hug and Chris McFarland
Ed Hug
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.09