Ed Hug vs. Jim McCauley — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Ed Hug had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .322). By the career numbers, Ed Hug had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Hug and Jim McCauley
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.607
0.607
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.322
0.322
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
12.92
53.08
Fielding Stats for Ed Hug and Jim McCauley
Ed Hug
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 9 Innings
41
1.19