Ed Hug vs. Jimmy Mathison — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Ed Hug had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .368). By the career numbers, Ed Hug had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Hug and Jimmy Mathison
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jimmy Mathison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.732
0.732
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jimmy Mathison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.368
0.368
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
Jimmy Mathison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Ed Hug
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Jimmy Mathison
Career
Per 600 PA
14.18
75.95
Fielding Stats for Ed Hug and Jimmy Mathison
Ed Hug
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Jimmy Mathison
Career
Per 9 Innings
29
1.06