Jim Hubbard vs. Leo Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Hubbard posted the stronger offensive profile against Leo Smith. Jim Hubbard posted stronger numbers in OPS (.938 vs .533) and on-base percentage (.438 vs .283). By the career numbers, Jim Hubbard had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Hubbard and Leo Smith
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.941
0.941
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.569
0.569
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.438
0.438
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.063
0.063
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 600 PA
0.322
0.322
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
0.19
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 600 PA
3.2
112.79
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
10.28
48.59
Fielding Stats for Jim Hubbard and Leo Smith
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.13
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
35
1.07
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.13
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
191
5.85
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.13
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
181
5.54
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.76
94.76
Jim Hubbard
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.171
5.171