Jim Howarth vs. Ed Samcoff — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Howarth posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Samcoff. Jim Howarth posted stronger numbers in OPS (.566 vs .083) and on-base percentage (.300 vs .083). By the career numbers, Jim Howarth had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Howarth and Ed Samcoff
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
254
600
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
0.595
0.595
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
0.298
0.298
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.038
0.038
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
0.486
0.486
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
8.76
8.76
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
6
6
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
0.9
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
4
9.45
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Howarth and Ed Samcoff
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 9 Innings
70
1.65
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.22
99.22
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.814
1.814
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.333