Tick Houston vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Tick Houston. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .419) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .219). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tick Houston and Jim Smith
Tick Houston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Tick Houston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.455
0.455
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Tick Houston
Career
Per 600 PA
2.77
25.16
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Tick Houston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.219
0.219
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tick Houston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Tick Houston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.033
0.033
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Tick Houston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.149
0.149
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Tick Houston
Career
Per 600 PA
2.57
23.38
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Tick Houston and Jim Smith
Tick Houston
Career
Per 9 Innings
17
1.06
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Tick Houston
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
0.62
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Tick Houston
Career
Per 9 Innings
82
5.09
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Tick Houston
Career
Per 9 Innings
73
4.53
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Tick Houston
Career
Per 9 Innings
89.02
89.02
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tick Houston
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.294
4.294
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Tick Houston
Career
Per 9 Innings
58.82
58.82
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tick Houston
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
0.5
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13