Ben Houser vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Ben Houser. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .711) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .322). Ben Houser had the advantage in home run production (9 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ben Houser and Jim Smith
Ben Houser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ben Houser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.728
0.728
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Ben Houser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ben Houser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.322
0.322
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ben Houser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.39
0.39
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ben Houser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.123
0.123
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ben Houser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Ben Houser
Career
Per 600 PA
66.96
77.56
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Ben Houser
Career
Per 600 PA
10.36
10.36
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Ben Houser and Jim Smith
Ben Houser
Career
Per 9 Innings
129
7.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Ben Houser
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
0.82
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Ben Houser
Career
Per 9 Innings
1147
62.56
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Ben Houser
Career
Per 9 Innings
1134
61.85
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Ben Houser
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.87
98.87
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ben Houser
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.791
8.791
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Ben Houser
Career
Per 9 Innings
11.63
11.63
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100