Paul Hoover vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Paul Hoover. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .586) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .306). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Paul Hoover and Jim Smith
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 600 PA
0.576
0.576
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
0.28
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 600 PA
0.03
0.03
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 600 PA
0.199
0.199
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 600 PA
0.413
0.413
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 600 PA
7.19
41.07
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 600 PA
5
28.57
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Paul Hoover and Jim Smith
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 9 Innings
37
1.36
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
0.95
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 9 Innings
190
6.97
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 9 Innings
187
6.86
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.42
98.42
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.054
5.054
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 9 Innings
70.27
70.27
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Paul Hoover
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
0.55
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13