Dana Holt vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Dana Holt. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .813) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .370). Dana Holt had the advantage in batting average (.351 vs .333). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dana Holt and Jim Smith
Dana Holt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.351
0.351
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dana Holt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.833
0.833
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Dana Holt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
0.37
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Dana Holt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.443
0.443
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Dana Holt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.093
0.093
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dana Holt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.277
0.277
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Dana Holt
Career
Per 600 PA
17.81
104.78
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Dana Holt and Jim Smith
Dana Holt
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
1.07
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Dana Holt
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
1.07
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Dana Holt
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
1.02
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Dana Holt
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Dana Holt
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100